I’m furious after my daughter’s school banned her from wearing Vivienne Westwood shoes – here’s why it’s hypocritical

Furious Mum Takes Issue with School’s Ban on Branded Shoes

A concerned mother has voiced her frustration over her daughter’s school, Wolfreton School in Willerby, East Riding, Yorkshire, for prohibiting students from wearing branded shoes. She believes the school’s rules regarding footwear are inconsistent and impractical.

The mother, Kelly, has two daughters attending the school, one in year 11 and the other in year 7. Both girls returned to school this week wearing Vivienne Westwood black pumps.

Kelly points out that her eldest daughter has been wearing these shoes since year 7 without any previous issues. However, during the summer break, the school introduced new guidelines specifying that all shoes should be unbranded, even popular choices like black Nike Air Force 1 style.

To Kelly’s surprise, on the first day back at school, both her daughters received letters threatening detention if they did not have the new, unbranded school shoes by Monday.

Kelly expressed her bewilderment, stating, “It is just ridiculous – the Vivienne Westwood shoes are just plain black shoes, they’re comfortable and they’re good quality so they last a long time. I know schools want kids to dress smartly but I would consider these shoes smart.”

She also questioned the school’s double standards, as branded coats and bags are permitted while branded shoes are not. Kelly asked, “Why does my daughter in branded shoes but a Primark bag and coat deserve to be punished, but other kids can walk around with designer bags and coats but unbranded shoes? It’s hypocritical.”

According to Kelly, this week included a uniform inspection for the students, with an assembly on uniform expectations scheduled. She believes that such events are a significant waste of learning time and questions how the brand of shoes affects a student’s ability to learn.

Kelly firmly believes the school’s focus should be on more critical issues such as bullying, smoking, and disruptive behavior.

Moreover, Kelly highlighted the unfairness of putting children in detention because their parents may not have the means or time to acquire new shoes by Monday.

Kelly stated her stance, saying, “I have told my children not to go to detention, and I am happy to be pulled into meetings because I won’t be buying them new shoes.” She even considered withdrawing her children from the school if the situation worsens.

Kelly also disclosed that the school suggested she reconsider whether Wolfreton School is the right fit for her children if she disagrees with its policies.

In response, a spokesperson for Wolfreton School explained, “In July, prior to the summer holidays, parents were provided with a clear communication of our expectations with regards to uniform for September. Assemblies also took place to remind our students about these expectations.”

The school emphasized its willingness to collaborate with families and requested that any incorrect uniform be corrected by Monday. They encouraged parents with specific concerns to reach out directly to the school to address any issues.

Meanwhile, in Gateshead, another school student, Layla Thomson, faced a similar situation when she wore Vivienne Westwood pumps to class.

Leave a Comment